Looks like the forum will need a dedicated “Using Qutebrowser” thread
That is so much fun and a little bit of headaches (is this right in english?)
But with a liitle help of friends, nothing is impossible. lol
There is just one thing i don
t like. The dependencies. Normally too much for me, especially all the qt things. BUT... In this case, i dont give a f… shit.
Really, i like Qb alot.
…iam a strange person…
That’s something I didn’t like about qutebrowser either - dependencies. But total size is still about the same as vivaldi or firefox (on Void anyway):
Size to download: 69MB
I’ll have to give qutebrowser another go. Used it for a few months about a year ago.
Yes, that’s correct (sums up Linux in general, actually).
How’s the CPU load? I’m trying Evince, but webkit2gtk seems to be even more gluttonous than chromium.
And it’s all @Dobbie03 's fault.
Anyway - QT sucks.
I accept your blame as well as your praise.
Can`t test now, because
i have uninstall luakit for Qutebrowser.
That almost feels like blasphemy.
Screenshot forthcoming - Main changes are moving away from the tray patch for dwm, using connman, and removing volumeicon. Now bar is one color. I never really cared much for multi colors in the bar.
Now that you have given us warning a screenshot is incoming I am now expecting a scrot to end all scrots.
Is it wrong to expose ones buttocks over a dual screen systems?!?!
Well? Is it?!?!
Depends on who you ask. Your Mum, then yes. Your lover? probably yes. The creepy guy in the van parked outside your house? No.
Some great work from Contributors this week: new version of nwg-drawer on Tuesday and nwg-dock today. Both have much lower CPU load now.
Top job again @nwg
That’s coming along nicely.